Why Putting Out a Wrong Idea Beats Starting From Zero
Mihika's counterintuitive take on building conviction: people react far more to an idea than to nothing, so putting out an opinion — even one that's totally wrong — is a better catalyst for a good solution than gathering insights from scratch. She frames it via Yuki's advice to enter user research with at least an 'A-minus idea': if research improves it, you hit an A-plus; if not, you're still not at a B.
- People are much more likely to react to an idea than to nothing — a wrong idea still moves you forward
- Younger PMs often distrust their own opinion and try to build up from zero; putting a stake in the ground is faster
- Go into research with at least an A-minus idea so feedback can only push it up
- Pair strong early conviction with 'strong opinions weakly held' — kill your darlings when external signal disagrees
“putting out an idea, even if it's like totally wrong, is a much better catalyst for getting to a good solution because people are much…”
“when you go into research, you want to go in with something that's like at least an A- minus idea or you think is at…”