Copying Is a Moral Arbitrage — Burn Your Resume
Pincus reframes copying proven products as a Peter Thiel-style 'moral arbitrage': founders resist it because school taught us copying is cheating and we want peer respect. He argues that leaves the opportunity open to founders with less ego, who define ambition by the consumer's experience rather than their peers' admiration.
- Resistance to copying is a moral bias, which makes it an arbitrage for the ego-free
- Define ambition in the eyes of your consumer, not your peers
- Copying alone gives no reason to switch; take something loved and make it one inch better
“in the Peter Teal sense it's almost a moral arbitrage”
“if you're truly ambitious, burn your resume.”