Why Leadership Recruiting Hides the Problems That Matter
Verna argues that conventional executive recruiting is a risky way for leaders to choose companies because both sides are rewarded for presenting an idealized match. Companies can replace a leader, while the leader must account for a large block of career time, so candidates should surface real problems before committing.
- Both sides tend to sell an idealized version of the role
- Avoiding problem discussions increases mismatch risk
- The career cost of a poor match is asymmetric for the leader
- Advisor or interim periods can reveal fit before a full-time contract
“we are optimized on both sides during recruiting process to sell rainbows and unicorns and butterflies, that everything is beautiful and this is matchmade in…”