LLenny's Podcast
← All frameworks
InnovationNaomi Gleit

Micro and Macro Barrier Removal

Grow by systematically removing both structural (macro) and friction (micro) barriers.

Difficulty
Moderate
Time to result
~months to results
Steps
3
Confidence
90%

A lens for driving growth by classifying barriers into two tiers: macro barriers are structural gates on who can even use the product (must be a college student, must own a smartphone, must have internet), while micro barriers are friction points inside the flows (a required email confirmation step). Growth work is systematically finding and dissolving both.

Origin

Developed thematically by Facebook's growth team across Gleit's tenure.

Core principles

  • 01Macro barriers gate access; micro barriers add friction inside the funnel
  • 02Removing a macro barrier expands the total addressable audience
  • 03Removing a micro barrier improves conversion for existing users
  • 04Look for product/technology solutions to problems others solve manually

How to run it

  1. 1

    Map the macro barriers

    List the structural requirements that limit who can use the product at all (eligibility, device, connectivity) and remove them one by one.

    Pro tip Each macro barrier removed opens a new audience — Facebook went college-only → high school → work networks → any email address.

  2. 2

    Instrument and find micro barriers

    Within the flows, use instrumentation to find friction points where users drop off.

    Watch out You can only see micro barriers if you've instrumented the funnel first.

  3. 3

    Engineer the friction away

    Redesign the flow so the barrier disappears rather than adding another step. Prefer an elegant product fix over forcing the user through the gate.

    Pro tip When email confirmation blocked 20% of users, Facebook let unconfirmed accounts receive notifications and counted any click as proof of email ownership — removing the step entirely.

    Watch out Adding another prompt (e.g. an SMS) is still a barrier; aim to eliminate the step, not duplicate it.

In the wild

The email confirmation micro barrier

Instrumentation showed 20% of people weren't confirming their email. Instead of nagging them, Facebook allowed unconfirmed accounts to receive notifications, and treated any notification click as an account confirmation because it proved ownership of the email.

A major drop-off point was removed by eliminating the confirmation step rather than reinforcing it.

Common mistakes

Duplicating the barrier instead of removing it

Sending an SMS to get around an unconfirmed email just adds a second friction point. The win came from redesigning so the barrier no longer existed.

Is it for you?

Best for

Growth PMs optimizing onboarding and access for a product with strong demand

Not ideal for

Products lacking product-market fit, where removing barriers won't matter because demand isn't there

From the transcript

the projects that we were working on were really at a high level around removing barriers there were macro barriers

39:00

what I would say is maybe applicable is really the micro barriers all of the work that we did on growth around optimizing the flows…

40:30

20% of people aren't actually confirming their email we tried sending them an SMS so maybe they would confirm the SMS instead

41:00

what we did was allow people to get notifications even as an unconfirmed account and then if they clicked on any of those notifications that…

41:00

From the episode

Meta’s Head of Product (and 29th employee) on working with Mark Zuckerberg, early growth tactics, why PMs are like conductors, and more

Naomi Gleit