LLenny's Podcast
← All episodes
David Placek (Lexicon Branding)29 June 2025

Naming expert shares the process behind creating billion-dollar brand names like Azure, Vercel, Windsurf, Sonos, Blackberry, and Impossible Burger

6Frameworks
14Insights

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster08:00

You Won't Know the Right Name When You See It

Placek dismantles the near-universal client belief that they'll instantly recognize the right name. Clients come in seeking comfort, but the bolder, more imaginative names feel uncomfortable at first, which is precisely why they get rejected. His maxim: there is no power in comfort.

  • Almost no client actually knows the name when they see it
  • Comfort-seeking makes clients reject the boldest, most imaginative names
  • Lexicon has completed roughly 4,000 naming projects
  • Great names require processing and living with the discomfort first
  • 'There is no power in comfort' — not in the marketplace

they're going to know it when they see it

David Placek · 08:00

there is no power in comfort

David Placek · 09:00
#naming#psychology#comfort#decision-making

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take22:00

Big Brainstorms Don't Make Great Names — Disguised Teams Do

Placek says large brainstorming sessions failed him; the best names came from small two-person teams. Lexicon runs three teams where only one knows the real client, another is told they're working for a different company, and a third names something entirely non-tech. Freed to make mistakes, the decoy teams produce most of the winners.

  • Large brainstorms don't produce great names; small teams do
  • Lexicon uses at least two or three teams of two people
  • Only one team knows the true assignment
  • A second team is told they work for a different company (e.g. Apple not Microsoft)
  • A third team names something unrelated like a bicycle or car
  • Most winning names come from the second or third team

We'll replace if we're working for Microsoft, the second team thinks they're working for Apple.

David Placek · 22:30

most of our names have come out of the second or third team

David Placek · 23:00
#naming#process#creativity#teams
Hot Take1:11:00

The .com No Longer Matters — Get the Right Name First

Placek argues the .com has become like an area code and matters far less than it did 25 years ago, especially as AI search erodes SEO. Get the right name first; if you can't get the exact domain, use a prefix or a .ai. He'd rather spend $30,000 on marketing than on buying a URL.

  • The .com/URL has become an area code — largely irrelevant
  • AI search will make SEO less important
  • Get the right name first, then chase the domain if you can
  • Workarounds: a prefix, a small word, or a .ai
  • People fixated on the .com are often older; Placek would spend the $30k on marketing

the com or URL address has become an area code

David Placek · 1:11:00

I'd put the $30,000 into marketing.

David Placek · 1:12:30
#domains#seo#naming#startups

Explainer· 5

Explainer14:30

The Cumulative and Asymmetric Advantage of a Great Name

Placek argues the name is the most-used, longest-lived brand asset, so a distinctive name compounds a bond with customers over time (cumulative advantage). A non-descriptive name also gives you an edge before you even launch (asymmetric advantage), which a generic descriptor cannot.

  • The name is used more often and lasts longer than any other brand element
  • Distinctiveness drives cumulative advantage as customers see it repeatedly
  • A great name delivers asymmetric advantage before launch
  • Descriptive names like 'cloud pro' can't stand out among ten rivals
  • Lexicon's mission is the 'right' name, not merely a 'good' name

Nothing's going to be used more often or for longer than that name.

David Placek · 14:30

Why not start with an advantage in the marketplace and you won't get an advantage if you're descriptive?

David Placek · 15:30
#naming#strategy#competitive-advantage#branding
Explainer36:00

What Makes Naming AI Products Different

Placek says AI is the fastest-moving category he's seen, and engineer clients tend to want more sophisticated names (like Codium, Anduril, Anthropic). His research across markets found developers optimistic about AI while consumers are skeptical, so he pushed Codium toward something more tangible and graspable — which became Windsurf.

  • AI is the fastest-progressing category Placek has experienced
  • Engineers gravitate toward sophisticated, abstract names
  • Lexicon invested ~$20,000 researching AI perception across countries
  • Developers are optimistic; consumers are skeptical and worried
  • Codium was steered toward a more tangible, natural name

engineers come to us wanting more sophisticated names, right?

David Placek · 37:30

Developers are all totally positive on it.

David Placek · 38:00
#ai-naming#research#developers#consumers
Explainer39:30

The Three Times It Makes Sense to Change Your Name

Placek lays out when a rename is worth the disruption. First, startups that grabbed any name early and have since sharpened their direction. Second, companies that have genuinely pivoted so the old name no longer fits. Third, merged companies that need a fresh start signaling new, bigger capabilities.

  • You must argue the change is worth it — bigger companies face bigger projects
  • Case 1: startups that just needed a name early and have since evolved
  • Case 2: the company pivoted and the name no longer reflects it
  • Case 3: a merger warranting a new start and expanded capabilities

you have to make an argument that it's worth the change, right?

David Placek · 40:00

They're raising money and they just need a name.

David Placek · 40:00
#rebrand#startups#naming#strategy
Explainer45:30

Every Letter Has a Feeling: The Science of Sound Symbolism

Placek explains sound symbolism — Lexicon's proprietary research on what each of the 26 letters evokes. V is the most alive and vibrant sound (Corvette, Viagra), B is among the most reliable (a rationale for BlackBerry), Z is noisy (Azure), and X is fast, crisp, and connotes innovation.

  • Each letter sends a signal that evokes a certain vibration or experience
  • V is the most alive and vibrant sound (Corvette, Viagra)
  • B is one of the most reliable sounds — part of the BlackBerry rationale
  • Z is a noisy letter (Azure); X is fast, crisp, and about innovation
  • Letters carry both sound-symbolic and semantic value

the sound of the letter B is is one of the most reliable sounds in the English alphabet

David Placek · 47:00

the founder actually said, I I thought the people at Lexicon were crazy when they presented BlackBerry

David Placek · 47:00
#sound-symbolism#linguistics#letters#branding
Explainer49:00

Processing Fluency: Why Vercel Feels Easy to the Brain

Placek uses Vercel to explain processing fluency — the idea that lazy brains lean toward easy-to-process information. Vercel is a coined word built from familiar, easy pieces (ver = truth/green, cell = accelerate), so the brain leans in rather than walking past. Complicated names are a liability.

  • Vercel is a coined name assembled from familiar, easy-to-process parts
  • 'ver' evokes truth/green; 'cell' evokes accelerate — what they do
  • Cognitive science says brains are lazy and dislike complexity
  • Easy-to-process names make the brain lean in
  • Complicated names are a liability Lexicon avoids

that's known as processing fluency

David Placek · 49:30

our brains are a little bit on the lazy side

David Placek · 49:30
#vercel#processing-fluency#cognitive-science#branding

Story· 4

Story05:30

Why David Flew Back to Santa Barbara to Save the Sonos Name

Placek recounts how the Sonos founders initially rejected the name for not being 'entertainment-like' enough. He believed in it so strongly he flew back down to Santa Barbara unbilled to make a second case, and a founder finally reframed the decision as naming for the marketplace rather than for themselves.

  • Sonos was rejected at first for lacking emotion and not being entertainment-like
  • Placek argued the company sold sound/speakers, not entertainment itself
  • Sonos is a palindrome that reads the same flipped or turned upside down
  • Founder Bob McFarland realized they should name it for customers, not themselves
  • Placek says he rarely fights this hard but felt strongly enough to fly back unbilled

we're trying to name this for ourselves and what we really should be doing is naming it for the marketplace and the customers

David Placek · 07:00

I'm so glad that I had this internal energy to I got to go down there and make a bid for this

David Placek · 07:30
#naming#sonos#client-persuasion#branding
Story11:30

How Azure Beat Microsoft's Instinct to Just Say 'Cloud'

Microsoft came to Lexicon wanting a descriptive name starting or ending with 'cloud.' Placek pushed back, warning they'd drown in an ocean of cloud-this-cloud-that. Azure (another word for blue) kept a subtle sky link while standing out on its noisy linguistic qualities; one client called it 'a dumb idea' before warming to it.

  • Microsoft wanted a descriptive 'cloud' name for its cloud service
  • A descriptor would leave them lost among competitors
  • Azure preserved a blue-sky-clouds link without being literal
  • The Z gives it noise and signal in a crowded market
  • A descriptor makes a statement; a great name starts a story

That's just a dumb idea.

13:30

you don't want to make a statement here. You want to you want to start a story right?

David Placek · 14:00
#azure#microsoft#descriptive-names#branding
Story32:30

How 'Windsurf' Was Found Sitting on a List

Formerly Codium, the AI coding product needed a name for something intangible. Lexicon's rule is to make the intangible tangible, so one team was tasked with listing everything that communicates dynamic flow and movement in real words, metaphors, and sports. Windsurf was sitting on that list — an experiential compound that checked every box.

  • Windsurf was Codium before the rename
  • Naming intangible code/process is hard; make it tangible
  • A team listed real words, metaphors, and sports about flow and movement
  • Windsurf captures a smoother, more dynamic coding flow
  • It's a compound and a literal physical experience

the name of Windsurf before it was Windsurf was codium, right?

David Placek · 33:00

it checks all the boxes it's it's a wonderful image it's an experience literally a physical experience

David Placek · 34:30
#windsurf#codium#ai-naming#story
Story1:08:30

Polarization Is a Sign of Strength: Andy Grove and Pentium

Placek learned from Intel's Andy Grove that tension in a team over a name is a good sign. Internally, engineers pushed the descriptive 'ProChip' against 'Pentium,' and Grove chose Pentium precisely because the polarization revealed energy for it. If your team is comfortable, you probably don't have the name yet.

  • Lexicon looks for polarization and tension, not consensus
  • Polarization signals strength and energy in a name
  • Andy Grove picked Pentium over the descriptive 'ProChip'
  • Grove read the argument as energy for Pentium
  • Comfort across the team means you likely don't have the name yet

polarization is a sign of strength in the word

David Placek · 1:08:30

that tells me there's energy for Pentium here and he said that's why I think we should go with it

1:10:00
#pentium#intel#polarization#decision-making

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway34:30

Why Compound Names Multiply: 1 + 1 = 3

Placek explains Lexicon's research finding that compound names like PowerBook and Facebook multiply associations rather than add them. Clients often resist compounds as too long, so Lexicon ran research to prove the multiplier effect and now shares it to win teams over.

  • Compounds like PowerBook and Facebook multiply associations
  • Two images combine so 1 + 1 = 3
  • Clients often want a shorter single word instead
  • Lexicon researched compound effectiveness to counter that objection
  • Imagery from both halves reinforces the name

So 1 plus one equals three, right?

David Placek · 35:00
#compounds#naming#research#branding
Takeaway1:02:00

Stop Evaluating, Suspend Judgment, and Speculate

For anyone naming on their own, Placek's core advice is to generate far more than you think you need — thousands of names and directions — and resist the human urge to over-evaluate. Instead of judging what's wrong with a name, speculate on what you could do with it and how you'd execute.

  • 200 names is not enough; aim for a thousand or more directions
  • Generate names without evaluating them at first
  • Humans survive by spotting what's wrong, which sabotages naming
  • Speculate on a name's potential and execution instead of judging it
  • The test is how you'd execute a name, as with the Windsurf imagery

don't evaluate them just just generate names and directions

David Placek · 1:02:00

stop evaluating, suspend judgment, and speculate

David Placek · 1:06:00
#naming#process#creativity#judgment