LLenny's Podcast
← All episodes
Gustav Söderström (Co-President, CPO, and CTO at Spotify)21 May 2023

Lessons from scaling Spotify: The science of product, taking risky bets, and how AI is already impacting the future of music

8Frameworks
15Insights

Episode overview

Spotify co-president Gustav Söderström explains how products are moving from user curation to algorithmic recommendation and now to generation, using Spotify's AI DJ as a concrete example. He argues that machine-learning interfaces must tolerate prediction failures and match their design to the model's actual hit rate. He also describes Spotify's shift away from small autonomous squads, the lessons from a controversial homepage redesign, and a scientific approach to testing risky product bets. The conversation closes with his practices for planning, explaining decisions, product development, and recommended books and tools.

Key ideas

  • The internet's dominant product paradigm is shifting from user curation to algorithmic recommendation and then to generative experiences.
  • Generative products should solve use cases that could not exist previously; Spotify's AI DJ combines personalized speech and music recommendations at scale.
  • Fault-tolerant interfaces should reflect a model's real accuracy, offer multiple candidates, and give users an easy escape hatch when predictions fail.
  • Spotify replaced its early small, highly autonomous squad model with larger teams and concentrated strategic autonomy around experienced VP-level leaders.
  • Organizational design reflects strategy: decentralized structures favor speed, while centralized structures favor a coherent user experience.
  • Spotify learned that its homepage primarily serves recall, not discovery, after a redesign inverted the balance and drove users toward search and their library.
  • Large redesigns require separating resistance to changed habits from evidence that the underlying design is wrong, using experiments, cohort analysis, research, and behavioral data.
  • Product leaders should hold strong hypotheses until evidence disproves them, then change direction without becoming emotionally attached to prior investments.

Transcript available · source text is retained privately and is not published

Frameworks in this episode

People & resources mentioned

Attributed to the moment in the episode. Timestamps are approximate.

People · 23

  • Gustav SöderströmMentionsGustav is a product legend and he's now the co-president, chief product, and chief technology officer at Spotify

    Today my guest is Gustav Söderström.

  • Lenny RachitskyMentionstoday we've got another very special compilation episode something I've been pulling on more and more with the podcast and the newsletter

    Welcome to Lenny's podcast where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts

  • Daniel EkMentionsDaniel Ek, the the CEO and co-founder of Spotify.

    And then I met through a mutual friend Daniel Ek, the the CEO and co-founder of Spotify.

  • Alex NorströmMentionsmy official title is co-president of Spotify together with Alex Nordstrom.

    my official title is co-president of Spotify together with Alex Nordstrom.

  • Xavier JerniganMentionsthere's a real person named X and we digitized X.

    there's a real person named X and we digitized X.

  • Chris DixonCoinedCredited with the observation that the next big thing often begins by feeling like a toy.

    I think I think it is straight from Chris Dixon is the principle of fault tolerant user interfaces.

  • The WeekndMentionsmentioned

    Like there's this Drake and The Weeknd thing that came out a week or two ago.

  • DrakeMentionsmentioned

    Like there's this Drake and The Weeknd thing that came out a week or two ago.

  • AviciiMentionsAvicii was not really considered by the existing music industry as a real artist

    right about when I grew up, Avicii came along.

  • Maya ProhovnikMentionsMaya is spotify's head of product for podcasting where she oversees product design and Engineering teams

    I know Maya's the VP of product, I believe, for the podcast product.

  • Jeff BezosMentionsthe Jeff Bezos thing that like the success of today was set in motion three years ago

    One downside that I'm extremely impressed with Jeff Bezos for seeing

  • Shirish MurarkaMentionsHe's on your board, I believe.

    Shirish Murarka suggested I ask you something. He's on your board, I believe.

  • Brian CheskyMentionsBrian chesky at Airbnb there was a whole article where we unpacked this moment in their product development cycle

    give a shout-out to to Brian Chesky at Airbnb

  • Hamilton HelmerCoinedhe's wrote written a a very I think useful book that would in some sense fit into my how to win box

    Seven Powers by Hamilton Helmer

  • Charlie MungerCoinedHis words and documents were assembled into Poor Charlie's Almanack.

    The Complete Investor by Charlie Munger.

  • Donald HoffmanCoinedmentioned

    The Case Against Reality by Donald Hoffman

  • Carlo RovelliCoinedmentioned

    Helgoland by Carlo Rovelli

  • David DeutschCoinedmentioned

    The Beginning of of Infinity and Fabric of Reality by David Deutsch.

  • Sean CarrollCoinedmentioned

    Something Deeply Hidden by Sean Carroll

  • Paul DaviesCoinedmentioned

    The Demon in the Machine by Paul Davies

  • Kurt GödelMentionsmentioned

    Gödel's Proof, I think is an amazing book on his uh incompleteness theorem

  • Lex FridmanMentionsthis reminds me of a story I just listened to on Lex Friedman's podcast

    my favorite question is Lex Fridman's small ending question

  • Gustav AlströmerMentionsmentioned

    Gustav with an F Alstromer uh was on the podcast

Resources · 54

  • Lenny's PodcastCoinedpodcast · Lenny Rachitsky

    Welcome to Lenny's podcast where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts

  • Microsoft ClarityRecommendstool · Microsoft

    Stop guessing, get Clarity. Check out Clarity at clarity.microsoft.com.

  • ClickUpUsessoftware · ClickUp

    Companies like DraftKings, Zapier, ClickUp, Twitch, and Cameo rely on Eppo to power their experiments.

  • ZapierUsessoftware · Zapier, Inc.

    Companies like DraftKings, Zapier, ClickUp, Twitch, and Cameo rely on Eppo to power their experiments.

  • DraftKingsUsescompany

    Companies like DraftKings, Zapier, ClickUp, Twitch, and Cameo rely on Eppo to power their experiments.

  • AirbnbUsescompany · Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia, and Nathan Blecharczyk

    When I was at Airbnb, one of the things that I loved most about working there was our experimentation platform

  • CameoUsescompany

    Companies like DraftKings, Zapier, ClickUp, Twitch, and Cameo rely on Eppo to power their experiments.

  • TwitchUsescompany

    Companies like DraftKings, Zapier, ClickUp, Twitch, and Cameo rely on Eppo to power their experiments.

  • EppoRecommendssoftware · Eppo

    Check out Eppo at geteppo.com.

  • SwedenMentionsplace

    I came back to Sweden.

  • YahooMentionscompany

    I had sold a company to to Yahoo in the mobile space.

  • SpotifyUsessoftware · Spotify

    So my job was to to head up mobile for Spotify and figure out what the mobile offering would be

  • Google DocsMentionssoftware · Google

    because I I love storytelling more than Google Docs I decided to do an internal podcast.

  • StockholmMentionsplace

    we actually fly people to Stockholm for certain onboarding session to learn about Spotify.

  • Discover WeeklyMentionsproduct · Spotify

    I think that's what led to discover weekly and a few other tools.

  • FacebookMentionscompany · Meta

    And that was your Facebook, Spotify and so forth.

  • The Last of UsMentionstv show · Craig Mazin and Neil Druckmann

    were trending yesterday in the last, you know, last of us episode or something like that.

  • SiriMentionssoftware · Apple

    we call it the Siri intent use case internally when you actually don't know what you want to listen to at all.

  • MidjourneyMentionssoftware · Midjourney, Inc.

    I think a very clear example actually is Midjourney.

  • DiscordUsessoftware · Discord Inc.

    You think about the early Midjourney user interface inside the Discord channel

  • DALL-EMentionssoftware · OpenAI

    using something like um DALL-E or Stable Diffusion or Midjourney the first time, it completely seemed like a magic trick.

  • Stable DiffusionMentionssoftware · Stability AI

    using something like um DALL-E or Stable Diffusion or Midjourney the first time, it completely seemed like a magic trick.

  • AmazonMentionscompany · Jeff Bezos

    on one spectrum, you have something like Amazon, which is known for two-pizza teams.

  • KindleCoinedproduct · Amazon

    It's produced, you know, it's produced um Kindle, it produced Alexa

  • AlexaCoinedsoftware · Amazon

    It's produced, you know, it's produced um Kindle, it produced Alexa

  • Amazon Web ServicesCoinedcompany · Amazon

    they were the ones who did Amazon Web Services because they had such hard-defined APIs

  • GoogleMentionscompany · Google

    Whereas if you look at something like Google, I think they struggled more with externalizing their APIs

  • AppleMentionscompany · Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne

    But then on the other spectrum, you have something like Apple, who's also a trillion-dollar company.

  • iPhoneMentionsproduct · Apple

    when you double click the power button on an iPhone, that Apple Pay comes up.

  • Apple PayMentionsproduct · Apple

    when you double click the power button on an iPhone, that Apple Pay comes up.

  • EcoRecommendsproduct · Eco, Inc.

    Go to eco.com/lenny, sign up for an onboarding, and find out why it isn't.

  • TwitterUseswebsite · Twitter

    There there was a lot of of negative feedback on Twitter on on some of that.

  • TikTokMentionssoftware · ByteDance

    because they found it on one of these services, like a TikTok or YouTube or something

  • YouTubeMentionswebsite · Google

    because they found it on one of these services, like a TikTok or YouTube or something

  • NorwayMentionsplace

    this is episode where they are in Norway without giving away too much.

  • FjällrävenMentionscompany

    paid brand positioning from a Swedish brand name Fjällräven

  • Stream OnMentionsevent · Spotify

    this is what we talked about at Stream On.

  • Seven PowersRecommendsbook · Hamilton Helmer

    one that I would recommend for other people to read is Seven Powers by Hamilton Helmer

  • The Complete InvestorRecommendsbook · Tren Griffin

    Another in sort of the space of mental models and frameworks, I think is the The Complete Investor by Charlie Munger.

  • The Mystery of the AlephRecommendsbook · Amir D. Aczel

    The Mystery of the Aleph, an amazing book.

  • Something Deeply HiddenRecommendsbook · Sean Carroll

    Something Deeply Hidden by Sean Carroll on the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics.

  • HelgolandRecommendsbook · Carlo Rovelli

    Helgoland by Carlo Rovelli on the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics.

  • The Beginning of InfinityRecommendsbook · David Deutsch

    The Beginning of of Infinity and Fabric of Reality by David Deutsch.

  • The Fabric of RealityRecommendsbook · David Deutsch

    The Beginning of of Infinity and Fabric of Reality by David Deutsch.

  • The Case Against RealityRecommendsbook · Donald Hoffman

    The Case Against Reality by Donald Hoffman on sort of evolution versus truth

  • The Demon in the MachineRecommendsbook · Paul Davies

    maybe one of my favorites is The Demon in the Machine by Paul Davies

  • Gödel's ProofRecommendsbook · Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman

    Gödel's Proof, I think is an amazing book on his uh incompleteness theorem

  • Halt and Catch FireRecommendstv show · Christopher Cantwell and Christopher C. Rogers

    an absolute favorite, which is uh Halt and Catch Fire

  • FXMentionscompany

    Halt and Catch Fire, which I think is on FX.

  • SuccessionRecommendstv show · Jesse Armstrong

    So we talked about Succession and it is a recent favorite.

  • DuolingoUsessoftware · Luis von Ahn and Severin Hacker

    We have a family account, and everyone is, you know, using it and competing every day.

  • GPT-4Usessoftware · OpenAI

    The obvious one is is uh Chat GPT GPT-4 and just playing around with that

  • ChatGPTUsessoftware · OpenAI

    The obvious one is is uh Chat GPT GPT-4 and just playing around with that

  • Apple PodcastsRecommendssoftware · Apple Inc.

    you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app.

Spot an error or want something removed? Request a correction or removal.

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Hot Take· 3

Hot Take22:00

AI Music Is Just a More Powerful Instrument

Gustav compares AI music generation to the digital audio workstation that let Avicii — once dismissed as 'not a real artist' — make music now considered real. He predicts diffusion models will act like a powerful new instrument enabling new creators and new genres, while paradoxically making true originality harder as generic music gets easier to produce.

  • Avicii was once dismissed because he couldn't play an instrument or sing; now his talent is undisputed
  • Diffusion models are best understood as a much more powerful instrument, not fake music
  • The AI-vs-real-music distinction is false; the real question is what percentage is AI and who gets to use it
  • As generic music gets cheaper to make, being truly unique becomes harder than ever
  • The rights/business-model problem, not the tech, is the real unsolved issue — mirroring the piracy era

the way to think about these these diffusion models if and when they get good enough at at generating music is probably the same, like…

Gustav Söderström · 22:30

as it now gets easier to create more generic music, it will actually be more difficult than ever to be truly unique.

Gustav Söderström · 24:30
#ai#music#creators#rights
Hot Take1:00:00

Believe 100% Until the Data Says No — Then Believe Something Else 100%

Gustav's antidote to getting 'precious' about products you've invested in: be brutal and unemotional, believe fully until the data disproves it, then switch completely. He notes the strange human bias that we distrust people who change their minds based on evidence — we celebrate confident prophets with little data and ridicule politicians who update their views.

  • The biggest risk after heavy investment is getting precious; you have to be brutal and unemotional
  • Believe in things 100% until the data says no, then believe something else 100%
  • It's the essence of 'strong opinions loosely held' — easy to say, hard to do
  • Humans irrationally love confident prophets and distrust people who update on evidence

You have to just be brutal. You have to believe in things 100% until the data says no. And then you believe in something else…

Gustav Söderström · 1:00:00

We actually tend to love prophets and people who hold very strong opinions with very little data.

Gustav Söderström · 1:01:30
#decision-making#leadership#data#psychology
Hot Take1:05:00

0% Art, 0% Magic, 100% Science — Force People to Explain Themselves

Gustav pushes his leaders to always explain their reasoning rather than defer to seniority, arguing that employees are owed an explanation even when they don't get agreement. He provocatively insists product decisions are '0% art, 0% magic, 100% science' — because 'art' and 'magic' are just labels for what we can't yet explain, and if you can't explain something, you probably don't understand it.

  • Employees don't have to agree, but they're entitled to understand why a decision was made
  • Deferring to seniority instead of explaining is unacceptable — you owe an explanation
  • If you can't explain it, you probably don't understand it — and often there's nothing there
  • 'Art' and 'magic' are just words for things not yet explained (genetics, quantum physics, and now intelligence via LLMs)

if you can't explain it yourself, you probably don't really even understand it yourself.

Gustav Söderström · 1:06:30

I say it's 0% art, 0% magic, and 100% science.

Gustav Söderström · 1:07:00
#leadership#communication#decision-making

Explainer· 4

Explainer13:30

The Internet's Three Eras: Curation, Recommendation, Generation

Gustav frames the internet's evolution in three stages: user curation (early Facebook/Spotify), then algorithmic recommendation, and now generation via AI. He argues generation is as big a shift as recommendation was, and will eventually force companies to rethink their products entirely.

  • The internet started with user curation, then shifted to algorithmic recommendation, and is now entering the generation era
  • The generation era will be as disruptive as the recommendation era, requiring product and sometimes business-model rethinks
  • Even though it's all machine learning, teams should treat generation as something completely new, not more of the same

we're going from your curation to recommendation to generation. And I suspect it will be as big of a shift that you will eventually have…

Gustav Söderström · 14:00

I tend to talk to my teams about even though it's all machine learning, I asked them to think of this as something completely different.

Gustav Söderström · 14:00
#ai#product-strategy#machine-learning
Explainer18:00

Fault-Tolerant UIs: Design for Your Model's Actual Hit Rate

Borrowing a principle from Chris Dixon, Gustav argues you must design your interface to match the real performance of your machine learning. A single play button only works if predictions are 100% accurate; if your hit rate is one-in-five, you need a UI that shows five options and an easy escape hatch. He cites early Midjourney's four low-res images as a model example.

  • A single play button demands 100% prediction accuracy, which never happens
  • If your hit rate is one-in-five, show at least five items on screen so one is likely relevant
  • Always give the user an easy escape hatch when the prediction is wrong
  • Early Midjourney generated four fast low-res images at once, matching its ~one-in-four quality

The quality of your machine learning, if you're going to have a single play button, needs to be literally 100% or zero prediction error.

Gustav Söderström · 18:30

What they did was they generated four simultaneous low-res images very quickly.

Gustav Söderström · 20:00
#ux#machine-learning#design#ai
Explainer31:00

Why Spotify Moved Away From Squads — and Where to Put Autonomy

Gustav explains Spotify has quietly moved away from the famous squad model: scaling in seven-person increments created huge overhead, and pushing full autonomy to the leaves of a very junior org produced '100 squads with 100 strategies running in 100 directions.' The lesson: put decision autonomy at the VP level, avoiding both the leaf-level chaos and the single-person-at-the-top bottleneck.

  • Seven-person full-stack squads created too much overhead at scale; teams are now ~2-3x bigger with fewer overhead roles
  • Hiring smart people means 'renting brainpower' — give them room to think or you're wasting the investment
  • Autonomy at the leaves plus a junior org produces heat: many teams pulling in conflicting directions
  • Autonomy only at the top bottlenecks throughput; the VP level is the sweet spot — many senior people with pattern recognition

if you're renting all of this expensive brain power and then you give them no room to think for themselves, that doesn't sound smart.

Gustav Söderström · 31:30

you're just going to produce heat. You're going to have 100 squads with 100 strategies running in 100 directions.

Gustav Söderström · 32:00
#org-design#management#autonomy#scaling
Explainer36:00

The Amazon vs Apple Org Spectrum — and Why Spotify Chose Centralized

Gustav lays out two extremes of org design: Amazon's decentralized two-pizza teams optimize for speed but ship the org chart to users (and forced hard APIs, which birthed AWS), while Apple's centralized functional org is slower but delivers a coherent, single-developer-feel experience. Because Spotify puts many content types with different business models into one app, it chose the more centralized, Apple-like model.

  • Amazon: decentralized, competing teams, fast to user, but tends to ship complexity and the org chart to users
  • Bezos forced hard APIs because competing teams have no incentive to cooperate — which made AWS possible
  • Apple: centralized functional org, slower, but delivers a coherent 'built by one developer for one user' experience
  • Spotify centralized because its single-app strategy with mixed business models demands one recommendation org and one UI
  • Both extremes work; the middle is where the 'smiling curve' says you don't want to be

he's well known for pushing extremely hard on hard APIs. Like if you don't create hard APIs to your technology, you're out.

Gustav Söderström · 37:00

you get the benefit of speed, but you get the drawback of kind of shipping your org chart and shipping complexity to the end user.

Gustav Söderström · 38:30
#org-design#strategy#amazon#apple

Story· 3

Story08:00

How an Internal Podcast Became a Spotify Recruiting Tool

Gustav started an internal, employee-only podcast interviewing Daniel Ek's direct reports to make leadership more approachable and share product strategy in an entertaining way. It worked so well internally that he took it public, and now new hires regularly cite the podcast as a reason they joined Spotify.

  • Listening to leaders for an hour makes them feel knowable in a way meetings and town halls don't
  • The internal podcast made senior leaders less 'otherworldly' and shared product-strategy thinking better than docs people never read
  • Making it public turned it into a recruitment tool: new hires cite it at Stockholm intro days as a key reason they joined
  • Making the podcast also built empathy for the podcast-creator problems Spotify is trying to solve

what if people that don't even work at Spotify yet could feel as if they knew people at Spotify?

Gustav Söderström · 10:30
#content#recruiting#culture#podcasting#leadership
Story15:00

The AI DJ: Spotify's First Product That Couldn't Exist Without Generative AI

Gustav describes the AI DJ as Spotify's only true generative product so far — one that couldn't exist without generative AI, using a digitized real person's voice to talk to you about your music at the scale of half a billion users. It finally solved the long-standing 'I don't know what I want to listen to' radio use case that Spotify had failed at for years.

  • The AI DJ generates both the voice and the content of what it says, enabling personalized voice at half-a-billion-user scale
  • It solves the 'Siri intent' / radio use case: cycling through options when you don't know what you want
  • It was a bottoms-up product built by the personalization team, requiring significant support and partnerships
  • Its guiding principle: do as little as possible and get out of the way, because people came for the music

we've only really done one sort of real generative product in in the hard definition, which is a product that couldn't have existed without generative…

Gustav Söderström · 15:00

the principle there was literally to do as little as possible and get out of the way.

Gustav Söderström · 20:30
#ai#product#spotify#generative-ai
Story44:00

Why Spotify's Discovery-Heavy Homepage Redesign Backfired

Users kept asking Spotify to help them break out of their 'taste bubbles,' so Spotify built feed-style discovery tools (which worked) and then loaded them onto the home screen — flipping it from ~90% recall/10% discovery to 10% recall/90% discovery. The quantitative data and Twitter backlash showed people weren't rejecting discovery; they were furious they could no longer quickly recall the playlists and sessions they already knew they wanted.

  • Breaking a taste bubble is a different problem: recommending a genuinely new genre means near-zero signal and a very low hit rate
  • Background recommendations need ~9/10 hit rate; discovery works at ~1/10 if the swipe cost is low and expectations are set
  • The sub-feeds worked, but putting them on home flipped it from 90% recall to 90% discovery
  • Angry tweets and quant data (traffic shifting to search/library) showed users couldn't find what they already wanted
  • Recall wants a dense, many-items UI; discovery wants lots of pixels and sound — they're opposite interfaces

We need something where one out of 10 is is a success. If you find one gem out of 10 tries, you're very happy.

Gustav Söderström · 47:00

we kind of switched it from 9010 to 1090 so 10% recall 90% discovery and while people want to discover they don't they probably don't…

Gustav Söderström · 50:00
#product#discovery#ux#ab-testing

Tool· 2

Tool1:08:30

The Distributed Walk-and-Talk

Gustav's go-to thinking method: put on AirPods and do one-on-ones as a 'distributed walk and talk' — both people walking in different locations while discussing a problem for an hour. Forced by the pandemic, it turned out more creative and fruitful than expected, combining more-than-your-own brainpower with the thinking boost of walking.

  • Do one-on-ones over AirPods while both people walk in separate locations
  • Combines extra brainpower (you're not alone) with the cognitive benefit of walking
  • The pandemic forced it; strategizing got better, not worse
  • Complements his older method of writing and rewriting ideas to condense them

I just put on AirPods and do like a distributed walk and talk. Both people are walking, but in different locations.

Gustav Söderström · 1:09:00
#productivity#thinking#remote-work#tools
Tool1:16:00

Gustav's Book Recommendations: Seven Powers, Munger, and More

In the lightning round, Gustav recommends Seven Powers by Hamilton Helmer as a starter strategy framework (used by Netflix and Spotify) and The Complete Investor on Charlie Munger, whose key lesson is to apply three different mental models to any problem. He then rattles off a long list of science and math books including Gödel's Proof, Something Deeply Hidden, and The Demon in the Machine.

  • Seven Powers by Hamilton Helmer — a strategy framework; no framework is right, but having one beats none
  • The Complete Investor (on Charlie Munger) — always apply three different mental models to a problem
  • Using multiple models that reduce dimensionality differently but agree vastly increases your odds of being right
  • Science/math picks: The Mystery of the Aleph, Something Deeply Hidden, Helgoland, The Case Against Reality, Gödel's Proof, The Demon in the Machine

one that I would recommend for other people to read is Seven Powers by Hamilton Helmer, which um Netflix has used a lot, we use…

Gustav Söderström · 1:16:00

you have a problem, you should always apply three different models to it

Gustav Söderström · 1:16:30
#books#mental-models#strategy#recommendations

Takeaway· 3

Takeaway26:00

All Truly Great Products Pull Some Kind of Magic Trick

Gustav argues that great products create a moment that feels like magic even though it's just data and statistics — like the AI DJ seeming to record a person saying things about your specific music. Crossing from 'cool and impressive' to 'I don't understand how this is done' correlates with products going viral, and it usually comes from fine-tuning, scoping down, and getting performance to the right level.

  • The magic trick correlates with products going viral and taking off
  • The AI DJ's trick: it felt like a real person recorded personalized lines, but it was generated
  • GPT and DALL-E/Midjourney felt like magic on first use even though there's no magic, just data and statistics
  • Crossing the line to 'feels like magic' comes from fine-tuning, scoping down, and removing things

obviously there is no magic. It's just data and statistics.

Gustav Söderström · 27:00

iterating a product to the point where it feels like magic the first time is is very helpful.

Gustav Söderström · 27:30
#product#ai#design#virality
Takeaway54:00

Redesigns Are Harder Than New Features — the Rearranged-Desk Problem

Gustav distinguishes two fundamentally different types of product development: a new feature is voluntary, so if you dislike it nothing got worse, but a redesign is not voluntary and imposes a cost even on people who dislike it. He uses the analogy of someone rearranging your desk after 12 years — even with data proving the new layout is better, you'll be upset because your habits are broken.

  • New feature = voluntary; a redesign is imposed on everyone, so it carries a cost even for those who dislike it
  • Redesign feedback splits two ways: you were right but broke habits, or you were simply wrong — and they look the same
  • The rearranged-desk analogy: better-by-data still upsets people who were effective in the old setup
  • To tell the cases apart, compare new user cohorts (no old habits) against existing user cohorts

there is a there are two fundamentally different types of product development one is designing a new feature it is hard to make it but…

Gustav Söderström · 54:00

I come in and I just rearrange all of it and you have spent in our case maybe 12 years with that setup it doesn't…

Gustav Söderström · 55:00
#product#redesign#change-management
Takeaway1:02:30

The 10% Planning Rule

A rule of thumb Gustav credits to Shishir Mehrotra: you shouldn't spend more than 10% of your time planning versus executing. In a 10-week quarter that's one week of planning; Spotify's 6-month increments mean about two weeks. If you're planning much more, you're either over-planning or your execution period is too short.

  • Spend no more than ~10% of your time planning versus building
  • A 10-week cycle = 1 week planning; Spotify's 6-month cycle = ~2 weeks
  • Over-planning signals either too much planning or too short an execution period
  • Attributed to Shishir Mehrotra, who used it since his YouTube days

you shouldn't be spending more than 10% of your time planning versus uh executing or or building.

Gustav Söderström · 1:02:30
#planning#execution#process