◆Hot Take12:30
Why an AI agent is more personal than a human
Intercom's founding mission was 'make internet business personal,' and McCabe wrestled with whether that survives an AI pivot. He argues it does: an instantly available, expert, consistent, friendly agent for every customer at every hour is more personal than making people wait days for a canned response. He concedes it may be post-rationalization but says AI is genuinely superior at the things we call personal and human.
- Intercom's mission was 'make internet business personal'
- McCabe questioned whether that mission still made sense with AI
- An always-available, consistent, expert agent beats a multi-day canned reply
- He argues AI can be superior at qualities we describe as personal and human
“so much more personal than making them wait two 3 4 days for a crappy canned response.”
“it actually is superior at the things we describe as personal and human relative to humans themselves.”
#ai#customer-service#philosophy#personalization
◆Hot Take15:00
AI is often superior — the Waymo case
McCabe uses Waymo to argue AI often beats humans on practical dimensions: it crashes far less, doesn't bug you, has no hygiene problems, and doesn't take wrong turns. He notes Uber now offers women female-only drivers because women feel safer in Waymos. He is pro-human for meaning and creativity, but wants AI and robotics for the practical, efficient 'glue' between the human parts of life.
- Waymo crashes 3-5x less than humans, per McCabe
- AI avoids human annoyances: hygiene issues, wrong turns, unwanted chat
- Uber offering female-only drivers reflects women feeling safer in Waymos
- McCabe wants humans for meaning, AI for practical, efficient value
“So, Whimo doesn't crash. It has 3 5 times less crashes than humans.”
“women love Whimo because they feel safer.”
#ai#waymo#automation#hot-take
◆Hot Take26:00
Founder mode: a soft coup, 40% turnover, 98% approval
McCabe describes taking an authoritarian, top-down approach: cutting costs, picking one lane (service), betting ~$100M of cash on AI, and rewriting the values as 'a sharp knife' to cut out ineffective parts of the company. He hardcoded a formula scoring people on both goals and value-behavior. It triggered a soft coup and letters to the board, ~40% turnover, but ended with a 98-99% approval of leadership and strategy.
- Cut costs aggressively and killed projects while nearing negative growth
- Picked one lane — service — over keeping an $80M ARR side business
- Committed nearly $100M of Intercom's own cash to AI
- Rewrote values as 'a sharp knife' and hardcoded a performance+behavior formula
- Provoked a soft coup and ~40% turnover, but reached 98-99% leadership approval
“I rewrote the values designed to be a sharp knife to cut out the parts of the company that I just knew wouldn't be effective.”
“it is the responsibility of the CEO to make brave and hard decisions unilaterally.”
#founder-mode#leadership#culture#turnaround
◆Hot Take36:00
The unglamorous reality of being a CEO
Asked if he regretted returning, McCabe says never — it was cathartic — but he's honest that most days aren't the swashbuckling adventure people imagine. Success means reviewing bonus policy and comp proposals, accountability meetings, 8-10 meetings a day, and racing through emails so no one feels slighted. He calls corporate life something that 'kind of sucks,' especially for high-agency people like him, and stays only for a broader mission.
- He never regretted returning; it was deeply cathartic after running away while sick
- Most CEO days are bonus policy, comp proposals and accountability meetings, not bold moves
- Rushing from meeting to meeting, 8-10 a day, isn't how he thinks life should be lived
- He only stays because a broader mission makes it worthwhile
“It'll be rushing from meeting to meeting having 8 n 10 meetings a day. I don't happen to believe that that's a great way to…”
“It's not it's corporate life kind of sucks, particularly for people like me.”
#leadership#ceo#founder#reality
◆Hot Take45:30
Jobs will go — and it's the demeaning work that should
McCabe doesn't find job loss touchy: technology has always taken repetitive, demeaning, dangerous jobs, while population, GDP and longevity rose and crime fell. He points to the horror of a human clicking a macro to answer the same question all day, and to the bright spark in workers who'd flourish doing something else. He expects fewer people needed in CX and repetitive sales/SDR roles, mildly disagreeing with Marc Benioff.
- Technology has always removed repetitive, demeaning, dangerous jobs
- Historically, population, GDP and longevity rose while crime fell alongside that
- Answering the same question all day by clicking a macro is a 'horrible use of a human life'
- Expects fewer people in CX and repetitive sales/SDR roles
- Slightly disagrees with Benioff, who said sales jobs aren't going away
“technology has done a really good job at stealing jobs that were repetitive, demeaning, dangerous.”
“Like what a horrible use of a human life.”
#ai#jobs#automation#future-of-work
◆Hot Take49:00
Why people will still pay more for humans
Even as AI aggregates and creates content, McCabe argues efficiency is not what humans value most — if it were, we'd always buy the cheapest of everything. People value beauty, human stories, heart and connection, and will pay more for an imperfect human like Lenny with his own take. The abundance of AI makes automated things worth zero, which is exactly why quality, craft, art and humanity command a premium.
- Efficiency is not the top thing humans value — or we'd always buy the cheapest option
- People value beauty, human stories, heart and connection
- They'll pay more for an imperfect human with their own story and opinions
- AI abundance drives the value of automated output toward zero
- Quality, craft, art and humanity are what command a premium
“humans value things like beauty and human stories and human heart and connection.”
“The abundance of AI is going to make automated things worth zero.”
#ai#human-value#content#economics